Independent Neighborhood News & Talking Points
18 Jun
The famous WG Hose Wagon will soon be history.
Whether or not the firefighting relic was worth it, this morning’s SJ Mercury bills this aging piece of fire-fighting equipment as the primary reason that Pierluigi Oliverio was the lone dissenting vote as the rest of the City Council approved of the City Budget last night:
The only council member to vote against Reed’s budget plan was Pierluigi Oliverio. Normally an ally in Reed’s effort to solve San Jose’s chronic deficits, Oliverio opposed plans to eliminate an outdated fire hose wagon in his district and reassign three firefighters.
Oliverio’s alternative proposal, to come up with the expected $368,000 to keep the wagon by closing the Willow Glen library in his district one day a week, garnered no support.
“I’m a little speechless at this point,” a disappointed Oliverio said.
But Councilwoman Judy Chirco said the city’s fire chief had stated the proposed staffing and equipment changes would not affect firefighter response.
She also noted that Oliverio had not sought community support for reducing library hours.
Ouch. Chirco is correct that Oliverio has taken some heat for the library proposal from members of the WGNA eList, although quite a few constituents understand the difficult decisions that needed to be made to close the budget gap.
On the other hand … from here in WG, it looks like our Councilmember’s efforts to honor other districts and respect the integrity of the entire city — rather than support the “mini-mayor” concept that has been the de facto operating standard for the City — have backfired. Dropping five hours of library service in the name of emergency medical services seems a reasonable trade-off, especially while the City debates a new Fire Station #37. WG will be the last new fire station built under an earlier bond measure, and full funding has evaporated as other districts have had their fancy stations built. So it’s unfortunate (and ironic) that Oliverio’s lone effort to protect services in his own district fell on deaf ears.
Oliverio’s response to the eList — via Chief of Staff Denelle Fedor — is reproduced in the comments below.
2 Responses for "Hose Wagon Gets the Short Shrift"
—– Forwarded Message —-
From: “Fedor, Denelle” < Denelle.Fedor@sanjoseca.gov>
Subject: RE: [WGNA] Library hours and Fire station 6
Dear E-list,
Councilmember Oliverio is in the evening session of the City Council meeting for today and has asked me to send an update to you regarding his proposal to keep the fire engineer position at Fire House 6.
Over the past seven years, the City of San Jose has built approximately three new fire stations. As a result; the city has hired 20 new firefighters for the city. Due to these new positions, the council felt that they needed to save money in the fire department and voted to eliminate the Hose Wagon/personnel at Fire House 6 in Willow Glen which costs $1,296,654.
Although the Hose Wagon is a dated piece of equipment; the councilmember as well as many community members felt the additional person at Fire House 6 was important to keep. However, the council decided not to keep the position at this time. The Hose Wagon and the engineer will cease on
July 1, 2008.
As you know, the council member included reducing library hours to provide some of the funding for his request to keep a fire engineer position. The proposal the councilmember made would have reduced library hours from 47 hours a week to 42 hours which equals 5 hours a week. The councilmember
proposed the 10% library hour cut to show that he understands that these are difficult budget times and he was willing to make a small concession in his district in the interest of protecting the residents for emergencies.
You may have seen in the councilmember’s memo that the city has been spending money on many different items that do not necessarily meet the needs of the residents they serve. Regarding the discussion of golf courses, for example, (as you may know), the councilmember has been very critical of city owned golf courses specifically two of them which are heavily subsidized by the city and costing millions of dollars each year.
The City currently owes over 30 million dollars to pay off these lease bonds. The 30 million dollars does not include the $2.26 million dollars for nets the council just voted to spend on for Los Lagos golf course which Councilmember Oliverio was the only council member to vote against.
Unfortunately (at least in the opinion of Councilmember Oliverio it is unfortunate), the council cannot “outright” close the golf courses to save money to pay for core services because the city owes millions of dollars on the golf courses.
Thank you to everyone who shared their concerns one way or the other. It is important to have these discussions and to understand what the city is choosing to spend money on and what it isn’t.
Denelle Fedor
Office of Councilmember Pierluigi Oliverio
In her monthly editorial, Willow Glen Times editor Carol Rosen gives her opinion on the last minute effort:
Leave a reply